Liking MYN better than GTD

I'm really liking MYN better than GTD. Instead of having a bunch of context lists, now I have one short list based on urgency (yes, urgency, or "start dates"; the book explains why). The list is short because stuff to do/review in the future is hidden.

Here's what my list looks like:

First, it's remarkable how short it is, compared to my huge GTD lists.

"High" is things that must absolutely be done today, even if I have to stay up late.

"Medium" is things to consider doing in the next couple of weeks. Some of them are recurring (every 3 days, every 4 months, etc.). The starred ones should preferably be done today, although they don't have to be.

"Low" is things that are "over the horizon" that I should at least review each week.

Also note what is not shown: the 136 hidden tasks. They are not shown because they have start dates in the future. Those are 136 tasks that I don't need to include in my weekly review, unlike in GTD. I really appreciate that.

comments powered by Disqus

Did you know?

I'm a software engineering consultant. This means I can help your company with your software engineering needs:

  • providing temporary manpower for short-staffed software projects

  • helping new software projects get off to a good architectural start

  • improving the performance and reliability of old, legacy software systems

  • doing an important investigation or small project that you've always wanted to do but haven't had time for

Since 1999, I have done software engineering projects for the Canadian government, for Silicon Valley startups, and for established Bay Area companies, for small companies and medium-sized companies, for successful commercial projects and open-source projects. 

Currently accepting small projects. If you have one, email or call me.